This film is finding itself near the top of a lot of “most
risky” of 2012 lists. It isn’t hard to see why. Disney appear to be frightened
of the film’s title (hence the dropping of the “...of Mars” portion. It has
significant competition 2 weeks after opening from The Hunger Games, one week
after that from the Clash of The Titans sequel (I know the 1st was
piss poor but still) and may yet find itself with competition a week after
opening from Mirror, Mirror. Yes I know the trailer got a seriously stink
filled buzz but hey...
Mirror, Mirror Trailer; Snow White movie number 1 has Julia Roberts play the Wicked Queen ‘Princess Bride’ style...
A $250m film that has neither an A-List star (such as is
left of that breed) nor a “name” director like Cameron, Nolan or Spielberg (No
disrespect intended for Andrew Stanton at all after he directed Wall*E and
Finding Nemo) , and is very difficult to summarise in a way that makes it sound
sensible, is a big risk in these times. That it is based on a popular, but
aging, set of books is probably not as much of a boon as it could be either.
So after a fairly underwhelming teaser trailer, it falls to
this to grab your attention and sell the film. And...
Well has that made the weekend of the 9th of
March a no g o area for anything other than seeing this film? They’ve certainly
gone all out to show us the film will be full of effects and have some ‘original’
action in it. I’m still waiting for the part where we see that it isn’t really
Mars at all. I'm maybe a little surprised at how much of the effects work they've shown off here, given that there's surely a fair amount of rendering still to go and there will inevitably be those complaining about the CGI not being of a high enough standard in places.
No comments:
Post a Comment